-
I wonder how long someone worked on that title… Some USA Today/Gallup poll stats on willingness to vote for various types of presidential candidates in the US; toward the end of the page includes figures from previous years (1937, 1967)
-
Accelerating Transition to Virtual Research Organisation in Social Science
-
“guide to research for undergraduates” (seems to mainly focus on the sciences)
-
beautiful photographs
-
“How the candidates are using the web, and how the web is using them.”
-
Internet researcher (unfortunately, some of the links to papers don’t yield anything)
-
data on US college retention and graduation by state (offers raw data, graphs and maps)
This entry was posted
on Friday, February 23rd, 2007 at 3:28 am and is filed under Del.icio.us Links.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
February 23rd, 2007 at 9:39 am
What really stuns me is the figures for a hypothetical atheist candidate. Atheism alone is the quality which a majority of Americans would not support. Theoretically, it means that the atheist is the only one on the list who could not get elected. It reminds me of this other study with similar findings. It’s disheartening and a little frightening.
February 23rd, 2007 at 9:55 am
I agree, that part is especially fascinating. I do wonder, however, how people would define it. That is, would a candidate have to come out and claim to be an atheist, or is it enough if a candidate just doesn’t express a devotion to a god. Does that distinction make sense?